<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Journos Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisamico.com/2007/01/16/can-journos-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisamico.com/2007/01/16/can-journos-blog/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from somewhere far away</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChinaLawBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisamico.com/2007/01/16/can-journos-blog/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>ChinaLawBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisamico.com/blog/2007/01/16/can-journos-blog/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Two things.  One, my biggest fear is that it won't be ignored; it will be read by China neophytes who are not reading anything else and they will start to view China as a cute place with things like its own hot toadies (yes, this was a post).  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, maybe they are listening.  There was actually a pretty decent post today on China's environment.  Nothing all that new in it, but it did stake out a real position and certainly if even half of the posts that preceded it were at this level, I would not have called for the boycott (to start in two weeks).  It then followed it up with a picture of some trees wrapped in cloth, and the post said "another thing to like about Beijing," so the jury is still out.  But ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things.  One, my biggest fear is that it won&#8217;t be ignored; it will be read by China neophytes who are not reading anything else and they will start to view China as a cute place with things like its own hot toadies (yes, this was a post).  </p>
<p>Second, maybe they are listening.  There was actually a pretty decent post today on China&#8217;s environment.  Nothing all that new in it, but it did stake out a real position and certainly if even half of the posts that preceded it were at this level, I would not have called for the boycott (to start in two weeks).  It then followed it up with a picture of some trees wrapped in cloth, and the post said &#8220;another thing to like about Beijing,&#8221; so the jury is still out.  But &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
